In 2016, Beasley bought top-rated revenue producing markets from Greater Media that had loyal audiences and highly-paid talent but as the ad market tightened, the company targeted successful stations in Boston, Philly, Detroit and Tampa in a risky attempt to cut costs -- now with multiple Nielsen books in, we have some answers.
- Cost-cutting – even messing with top-rated talent – is nothing new – all the major group have done it.
- But Beasley is a relatively small radio group which relies on a handful of markets to keep them afloat so their desperate attempt to cut costs had real implications for the entire group’s financial performance.
- What has been learned: some market moves were mixed-to-bad, others stable but shaky, quiet and telling – some downright warning of real consequences in the months ahead.
Read the full article now
Recent Posts
- The Unintended Consequences of the CBS Radio News Shutdown
- The Major Market Selloff
- Salem’s $31 Million “Inside Job”
- The Disconnected Dashboard
- Is Saga’s Turnaround Working?
- Beasley’s Hall Pass
- iHeart’s Q1 Growth Masks Profitability Decay
- Townsquare’s Deceiving Earnings Report
- Radio's New Global Capital Play
- Why Billionaires Keep Buying Dying Linear Media