- The guardrails for stations looking to successfully rebrand.
- The important step most stations skip over.
- Lessons from Starbucks, Gap and Twitter’s rebrand.
- Now it can be told: the reason consolidators pushed to replace radio with audio.
- The radio group that reportedly renamed a major market powerhouse based on the CEO’s wife’s preference.
Forward to a friend here
Free samples of our work here.
Click to read: Listeners Paying Streaming Rate Hikes Rather Than Free Radio … Religion is Soaring, Salem is Not… The Core Needs of Listeners Have Changed … Satellite has a Radio Problem … The Golden Bachelor Warning… Audacy’s Screwed Up Bankruptcy … The Rise of Unions in Media … Spillover Effects of a Disney TV Sale … The Projected Outcome of the Audacy Bankruptcy Talks … Audacy Hedges Its Bets …
You may also like: Threads, Twitter & Radio … Breaking Down Audacy’s 1-for3- Reverse Stock Split… AI’s Projected Impact on the Music Business … Not That Format Hot Clock, This One … iHeart’s Misleading AI Goals… Cash-Strapped Audacy Paying Millions to Retain Execs … Radio’s Streaming Mistakes … Radio rethinking Digital … Listeners Demands to Return to Radio … Competing Against Failed Radio Groups
Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed. Everything else is just public relations -- George Orwell
Recent Posts
- A Dollar Look at Cumulus Deep Cuts This Year
- The Shutting Down of FM Stations
- Behind the Scenes of the Audacy Housecleaning
- And the New Audacy CEO Will Be …
- What’s Impacting Radio’s Digital Business
- A Hurdle Slowing Townsquare’s “Digital First”
- The $47 Million Radio CEO
- A Challenge to Saga’s Business Model
- What Audacy is Up to with Staffing
- A Closer Look at iHeart Spells Trouble